added dumy request info to directly return an error on invalid API rule

core/collection_validate.go

@@ -489,7 +489,7 @@ func (validator *collectionValidator) checkRule(value any) error {
 		return nil // nothing to check
 	}
 
-	r := NewRecordFieldResolver(validator.app, validator.new, nil, true)
+	r := NewRecordFieldResolver(validator.app, validator.new, &RequestInfo{}, true)
 	_, err := search.FilterData(vStr).BuildExpr(r)
 	if err != nil {
 		return validation.NewError("validation_invalid_rule", "Invalid rule. Raw error: "+err.Error())

core/collection_validate_test.go

@@ -319,8 +319,8 @@ func TestCollectionValidate(t *testing.T) {
 				c.ListRule = types.Pointer("!invalid")
 				c.ViewRule = types.Pointer("missing = 123")
 				c.CreateRule = types.Pointer("id = 123 && missing = 456")
-				c.UpdateRule = types.Pointer("(id = 123")
-				c.DeleteRule = types.Pointer("missing = 123")
+				c.UpdateRule = types.Pointer("@request.body.missing:changed = false")
+				c.DeleteRule = types.Pointer("(id=123")
 				return c, nil
 			},
 			expectedErrors: []string{"listRule", "viewRule", "createRule", "updateRule", "deleteRule"},
@@ -333,7 +333,7 @@ func TestCollectionValidate(t *testing.T) {
 				c.ListRule = types.Pointer("")
 				c.ViewRule = types.Pointer("f1 = 123")
 				c.CreateRule = types.Pointer("id = 123 && f1 = 456")
-				c.UpdateRule = types.Pointer("(id = 123)")
+				c.UpdateRule = types.Pointer("(id = 123 && @request.body.f1:changed = false)")
 				c.DeleteRule = types.Pointer("f1 = 123")
 				return c, nil
 			},

core/record_field_resolver_runner.go

@@ -80,6 +80,7 @@ func (r *runner) run() (*search.ResolverResult, error) {
 	}
 
 	if r.activeProps[0] == "@request" {
+		// @todo consider returning an error instead?
 		if r.resolver.requestInfo == nil {
 			return &search.ResolverResult{Identifier: "NULL"}, nil
 		}